Modern psycho-acoustics and its impact on Schenkerian analysis
K C Moore
8 Honest sampling
Even if Schenker's argument for the derivation of the Ursatz from the harmonic
series were coherent, it would fail to carry conviction because of its
inconsistency with the real world of music, in which small integer ratios are
not of the essence of consonance. However, much of Free Composition consists of
Schenker's analyses of a multitude of examples from composers of the nineteenth
and earlier centuries (Table 1). By implication, these
examples are selected from the masters, those whom Schenker
considers composers of true music. Unfortunately, no prescription, other than
the analytical method itself, is given to determine whether a composer is a
master. The introduction to Free Composition mentions J. S. Bach,
C. P. Bach, Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Mendelssohn.
These are also strongly represented in the examples, though there Chopin comes
in second place to Beethoven.
Use if your browser can't find Targets
A second worrying characteristic of Free Composition is that the method of
choosing the examples is not described, and though they appear copious at first
sight, they represent only a small fraction of the works of the composers
chosen: Beethoven is most generously represented, with 136 examples from
approximately 520 movements which can be identified from the list of his works.
 Brahms, who wrote nearly 600 movements, is
represented by a mere 34 examples. Overall, with 20 composers, some even more
copious than Brahms and Beethoven, represented by 533 examples, we are offered
analyses of a small fraction of the work even of those, while of others, such
as Telemann, Spohr, C. M. von Weber, Wagner and Liszt, surely
worthy to stand beside C. P. E. Bach, Paganini or Josef Strauss,
we are shown nothing. One is therefore left with the suspicion that movements
have been selected for conformity with the thesis.